Equestrian Statue of Louis XIV, after Martin van den Bogaert known as Desjardins 1729 - 1731

Unknown artist

BronzeMetal
43 ⨯ 38 cm
Currently unavailable via Gallerease

• About the artwork
  The image of the mounted sovereign dates back from antiquity, with Marcus Aurelius as prime example. It was seen as the most dignified and superior representation of power. Once Louis XIV had reached the pinnacle of his glory in 1685, a program was set up to spread the image of this power to every nook and cranny of the French realm. A great number of monuments were erected as proof of honour and loyalty to Louis le Grand. For this purpose ten squares, the so called ‘Places Royal’, were created to accommodate the huge equestrian statues. In 1688 such a statue was commissioned to Martin van den Bogaert for the Place Bellecour in Lyon.
  Just like the immense equestrian statues from the hand of François Girardon and others,in Paris, Aix en Provence and other cities, this statue did not survive the French revolution.
  Martin van den Bogaert was born in Breda in 1637 and was trained as a painter in Antwerp. Soon he moved to Paris where he gallicized his name and became a sculptor. He died in Paris in 1694, but his fame stretched way passed his demise, because of the demand for the smaller version of statue throughout Europe. The model was also modified (another head) to be issued as le Grand Dauphin and Maximilian II of Bavaria.
  
  The importance of the equestrian statue of Louis XIV was thought to be so enormous, that Diderot used it in his Encyclopédie to clarify the art of bronze casting. This statue after Desjardin is part of the most important collections in the world, like the collection of the Queen of England, the Wallace collection in London, the Metropolitan Museum in New York and the Louvre.
  
  This statue of Louis XIV after Martin Desjardins is cast around 1730.
• About the artist

  It might happen that an artist or maker is unknown.

  Some works are not to be determined by whom it is made or it is made by (a group of) craftsmen. Examples are statues from the Ancient Time, furniture, mirroirs, or signatures that are not clear or readible but as well some works are not signed at all.

  As well you can find the following description:

  •“Attributed to ….” In their opinion probably a work by the artist, at least in part

  •“Studio of ….” or “Workshop of” In their opinion a work executed in the studio or workshop of the artist, possibly under his supervision

  •“Circle of ….” In their opinion a work of the period of the artist showing his influence, closely associated with the artist but not necessarily his pupil

  •“Style of ….” or “Follower of ….” In their opinion a work executed in the artist’s style but not necessarily by a pupil; may be contemporary or nearly contemporary

  •“Manner of ….” In their opinion a work in the style of the artist but of a later date

  •“After ….” In their opinion a copy (of any date) of a work of the artist

  •“Signed…”, “Dated….” or “Inscribed” In their opinion the work has been signed/dated/inscribed by the artist. The addition of a question mark indicates an element of doubt

  •"With signature ….”, “With date ….”, “With inscription….” or “Bears signature/date/inscription” in their opinion the signature/ date/ inscription has been added by someone other than the artist