German Boulle-technique Marquetry Writing Box by Unknown artist
Scroll to zoom, click for slideshow

German Boulle-technique Marquetry Writing Box 1719 - 1721

Unknown artist

Tortoise shellWoodPewterMetalBrass
9 ⨯ 30 ⨯ 24 cm
Currently unavailable via Gallerease

  • About the artwork
    This stationary box, that can be locked, has an interior with compartments for paper, an inkwell, a sander and quills. The outside is decorated in ‘Boulle’-technique. The top of the lid is decorated with ribbons of tortoise-shell on a brown and red base, mounted in tin. The box is richly decorated with tortoise shell, embellished with brass and pewter ornaments, framed in brass borders.

    This box was arguably manufactured in the Boulle-workshop of Willem de Grof in Munich. Willem de Grof (1676-?) originated from Antwerp and served the French court of Louis XIV from 1708 onwards. There Elector Max Emmanuel of Bavaria got acquainted with de Grof’s work. The Elector invited de Grof to come to work in Munich. In 1716 de Grof satisfied the Elector’s request and set up a Boulle-workshop and a bronze foundry where he made bronze sculptures for the Bavarian court. The pedestals of these sculptures were often decorated with Boulle technique.
  • About the artist

    It might happen that an artist or maker is unknown.

    Some works are not to be determined by whom it is made or it is made by (a group of) craftsmen. Examples are statues from the Ancient Time, furniture, mirroirs, or signatures that are not clear or readible but as well some works are not signed at all.

    As well you can find the following description:

    •“Attributed to ….” In their opinion probably a work by the artist, at least in part

    •“Studio of ….” or “Workshop of” In their opinion a work executed in the studio or workshop of the artist, possibly under his supervision

    •“Circle of ….” In their opinion a work of the period of the artist showing his influence, closely associated with the artist but not necessarily his pupil

    •“Style of ….” or “Follower of ….” In their opinion a work executed in the artist’s style but not necessarily by a pupil; may be contemporary or nearly contemporary

    •“Manner of ….” In their opinion a work in the style of the artist but of a later date

    •“After ….” In their opinion a copy (of any date) of a work of the artist

    •“Signed…”, “Dated….” or “Inscribed” In their opinion the work has been signed/dated/inscribed by the artist. The addition of a question mark indicates an element of doubt

    •"With signature ….”, “With date ….”, “With inscription….” or “Bears signature/date/inscription” in their opinion the signature/ date/ inscription has been added by someone other than the artist