Portrait of a man with two Gnadenpfennigs, likely Wilhelm Daser (1566-1639) by Unknown artist
Portrait of a man with two Gnadenpfennigs, likely Wilhelm Daser (1566-1639) by Unknown artist
Portrait of a man with two Gnadenpfennigs, likely Wilhelm Daser (1566-1639) by Unknown artist
Portrait of a man with two Gnadenpfennigs, likely Wilhelm Daser (1566-1639) by Unknown artist
Portrait of a man with two Gnadenpfennigs, likely Wilhelm Daser (1566-1639) by Unknown artist
Portrait of a man with two Gnadenpfennigs, likely Wilhelm Daser (1566-1639) by Unknown artist
Portrait of a man with two Gnadenpfennigs, likely Wilhelm Daser (1566-1639) by Unknown artist
Portrait of a man with two Gnadenpfennigs, likely Wilhelm Daser (1566-1639) by Unknown artist

Portrait of a man with two Gnadenpfennigs, likely Wilhelm Daser (1566-1639) 1612

Unknown artist

WoodOil paintMetalCopperPaint
€ 2.500

Jongeling Numismatics & Ancient Art

  • About the artwork
    German school, unsigned but attributed to Lorenz Strauch, dated 1612.

    Oil on copper, ca. 10.5 x 13.0 cm. Including frame: 17.0 x 19.5 cm

    Portrait three-quarter facing, dressed in black with millstone collar. Around the neck and also around the waist a gnadenpfennig with portrait, probably of the Duke of Wurtemberg. Coat of arms with typical German beak-shaped crest and dating top right.

    Good condition, some retouching and locally blurred in varnish. In probably 19th century plaster frame.

    Lorenz Strauch (1554-1630) was a Nuremberg painter and copper engraver who focused mainly on portraiture. Many of his portraits are signed with his full name or his monogram LS. A few however, are unsigned, and are attributed to him on the basis of style. Characteristic of Strauch is the suspicious look of the painted.
  • About the artist

    It might happen that an artist or maker is unknown.

    Some works are not to be determined by whom it is made or it is made by (a group of) craftsmen. Examples are statues from the Ancient Time, furniture, mirroirs, or signatures that are not clear or readible but as well some works are not signed at all.

    As well you can find the following description:

    •“Attributed to ….” In their opinion probably a work by the artist, at least in part

    •“Studio of ….” or “Workshop of” In their opinion a work executed in the studio or workshop of the artist, possibly under his supervision

    •“Circle of ….” In their opinion a work of the period of the artist showing his influence, closely associated with the artist but not necessarily his pupil

    •“Style of ….” or “Follower of ….” In their opinion a work executed in the artist’s style but not necessarily by a pupil; may be contemporary or nearly contemporary

    •“Manner of ….” In their opinion a work in the style of the artist but of a later date

    •“After ….” In their opinion a copy (of any date) of a work of the artist

    •“Signed…”, “Dated….” or “Inscribed” In their opinion the work has been signed/dated/inscribed by the artist. The addition of a question mark indicates an element of doubt

    •"With signature ….”, “With date ….”, “With inscription….” or “Bears signature/date/inscription” in their opinion the signature/ date/ inscription has been added by someone other than the artist

Are you interested in buying this artwork?

Artwork details